Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined amino acids and micronutrients increased bulb total soluble solids.

A claim from EFFECT OF AMINO ACIDS AND MICRONUTRIENTS FOLIAR APPLICATION ON ONION GROWTH, YILD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND CHEMICAL CHRACTERISTICS · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amino acids and micronutrients increased bulb total soluble solids.

Taxon
onion plantsAllium cepae0
Treatment
foliar application for both amino acids and micronutrients togethere0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application for both amino acids and micronutrients together on onion plants led to an increase in onion yield and its components, total soluble solids and NPK bulb contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–990

Title

EFFECT OF AMINO ACIDS AND MICRONUTRIENTS FOLIAR APPLICATION ON ONION GROWTH, YILD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND CHEMICAL CHRACTERISTICS

A. A. Khalil; E. A. M. Osman; F. A. F. Zahran Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2008. doi:10.21608/jssae.2008.199876

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-9bea783eefd13a0ecc6f97597ba28b7c47ce009577721c3c8a3bf0f87787e508 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.