Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pendimethalin plus cowpea intercropping, earthing up, and straw mulching gave higher grain yield than the other treatments except the dhaincha treatment.

A claim from Effect of Planting Patterns and Weed Control Treatments on Growth and Yield of Spring Maize · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus cowpea intercropping, earthing up, and straw mulching gave higher grain yield than the other treatments except the dhaincha treatment.

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse1
Treatment
pendimethalin + intercropping of cowpea f. b. earthing up + straw mulchinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher grain yield was obtained in treatments that are pendimethalin + intercropping of cowpea f. b. earthing up + straw mulching and intercropping dhaincha f. b. earthing up + straw mulching which were statistically at par with one another during 2023 and 2024 and both treatments were found to be significantly better than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1737
e1

“spring maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–431

Title

Effect of Planting Patterns and Weed Control Treatments on Growth and Yield of Spring Maize

Ramandeep Singh; U.S. Walia Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal 2024. doi:10.18805/ag.d-6189

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-9d87cb3504e8aa296921728f0fb60560318824b09162f91ae0026025c82cd93b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

364 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.