Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Weed growth and nutrient uptake in organically managed rice and maize as affected by nitrogen management and live mulching with cowpea

Noyingthung Kikon; N. Khumdemo Ezung; J.K. Choudhary; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field investigations were conducted during 2015 and 2016 kharif seasons at the experimental farm of ICAR, Nagaland Centre, Medziphema to study weed growth and nutrient uptake in organically managed rice and maize as affected by N management and live mulching with cowpea. The experiment was laid out in factorial RBD with two kharif crops viz., rice (C1) and maize (C2), two organic N management viz., vermicompost @ 2 t/ha (N1) and vermicompost @ 2.7 t/ha (N2) and two mulches viz., control (No mulching) (L1) and live mulching with cowpea (L2). The dominant weed species observed were Cynodon dactylon, Digitaria setigera, Ageratum conyzoides, Amaranthus viridis, Cyperus iria and Cyperus rotundus. Weed density, dry weight and NPK uptake was found to be significantly lower in maize compared to rice during both years. Weed growth and NPK uptake was also found to be significantly higher with application of vermicompost @ 2.7 t/ha (N2) compared to 2 t/ha (N1) whereas, significantly lower weed growth as well as NPK uptake was also recorded with cowpea live mulch (L2) as compared to no mulching (L1). Cowpea live mulch (L2) with application of vermicompost @ 2 t/ha (N1) was found to record significantly lower NPK uptake by weeds in both crops. Yield and yield attributes of rice and maize were observed to be higher under cowpea live mulch with application of vermicompost @ 2.7 t/ha (N2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cynodon dactylon, Digitaria setigera and Ageratum conyzoides were among the dominant weeds.

Taxon
rice and maizeOryza sativaZea mayst0
Interactor
Cynodon dactylonCynodon dactylone0weed
Outcome
dominant weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominant weed species observed were Cynodon dactylon, Digitaria setigera, Ageratum conyzoides, Amaranthus viridis, Cyperus iria and Cyperus rotundus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density, dry weight and NPK uptake were significantly lower in maize than rice in both years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Weed density, dry weight and NPK uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ricee0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed density, dry weight and NPK uptake was found to be significantly lower in maize compared to rice during both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher vermicompost rate significantly increased weed growth and NPK uptake.

Taxon
rice and maizeOryza sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 2.7 t/hae0
Outcome
Weed growth and NPK uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed growth and NPK uptake was also found to be significantly higher with application of vermicompost @ 2.7 t/ha (N2) compared to 2 t/ha (N1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea live mulch significantly lowered weed growth and NPK uptake relative to no mulch.

Taxon
rice and maizeOryza sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
cowpea live mulche0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
weed growth as well as NPK uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
no mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower weed growth as well as NPK uptake was also recorded with cowpea live mulch (L2) as compared to no mulching (L1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea mulch plus 2 t/ha vermicompost significantly lowered weed NPK uptake in both crops.

Taxon
rice and maizeOryza sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
Cowpea live mulch (L2) with application of vermicompost @ 2 t/ha (N1)e0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
NPK uptake by weedse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea live mulch (L2) with application of vermicompost @ 2 t/ha (N1) was found to record significantly lower NPK uptake by weeds in both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice and maize yield and yield attributes were higher under cowpea mulch with 2.7 t/ha vermicompost.

Taxon
rice and maizeOryza sativaZea mayse0
Treatment
cowpea live mulch with application of vermicompost @ 2.7 t/hae0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
Yield and yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and yield attributes of rice and maize were observed to be higher under cowpea live mulch with application of vermicompost @ 2.7 t/ha (N2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1396 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 50 positive, 3 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

mulching · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
    Mulching reduced rice yield by 43% in one of four comparisons with burning.

    Effect of residue management and fallow length on weeds and rice yield · 1998 · compared with farmers' traditional burning of crop and weed residues

    Opposite direction

  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mulching · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

mulching · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

fertilization · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 34 positive, 28 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.