Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tillage methods did not differ significantly in corn ear diameter (ED).

A claim from Response of Grain Yield and Yield Components of Corn to Different Tillage Methods in the Arid Lands of Iran · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage methods did not differ significantly in corn ear diameter (ED).

Treatment
tillage methode0
Outcome
ear diameter (ED)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Grain Yield and Yield Components of Corn to Different Tillage Methods in the Arid Lands of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107
e0

“The statistical results of the study indicated that tillage method significantly (P 0.05) affected grain yield, number of plants per hectare (NPPH) and number of rows per ear (NRPE), but there was no significant differences in other components such as number of ears per plant (NEPP), number of grains per row (NGPR), ear diameter (ED) and ear length (EL).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–867

Title

Response of Grain Yield and Yield Components of Corn to Different Tillage Methods in the Arid Lands of Iran

Mohammad Sarhadi; Saeed Mohammadi; Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi 2012

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-9dbc8c3e1ba328cd5ce89694a97fc3b946a0f91e570ec3e27b30a49e448bb0e7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.