Intervention effectmodel-written summary

RDF significantly improved grain yield.

A claim from Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Enhancing Rice Yield and Reducing Methane Emissions in Degraded Soils via Soil Amendments and Silicon Application · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF significantly improved grain yield.

Treatment
RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of RDF resulted in significant improvements in rice growth, Si uptake, phosphorus (P) uptake, and ultimately, grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–998

Title

Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Enhancing Rice Yield and Reducing Methane Emissions in Degraded Soils via Soil Amendments and Silicon Application

Agbesi Kwadzo Keteku; Isaac Kodzo Amegbor; Felix Frimpong; et al. International Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.1155/2024/5928777

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-9fcd5be4d1da9b2cb3affd2ad7f0d412255269873dc2a9a7ebd46c535185d9b7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    P fertilizer application increased grain numbers per panicle by 23.9% in rice.

    Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization affects the flowering time of rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2019

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Silicon applied as topdressing at the reproductive stage significantly increased tiller number, weight per panicle and weight of 100 grains in rice.

    Silicon mediated improvement in agronomic traits, physiological parameters and fiber content in Oryza sativa · 2020

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

    Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems · 2009 · compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    CRFs had no effect on crop yield.

    Effect of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Crop Yields: A Meta‐analysis · 2016

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The authors found fertilizer and irrigation investment had limited effects on rice production.

    Moving toward rice self-sufficiency in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030: Lessons learned from 10 years of the Coalition for African Rice Development · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Green manure and rice straw nitrogen, alone or in combination with inorganic N, gave lower grain yield, agronomic efficiency and apparent nitrogen uptake than a standard split application of prilled urea.

    Long-term Comparison of the Agronomic Efficiency and Residual Benefits of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen Sources for Tropical Lowland Rice · 1996 · compared with a standard split application of prilled urea

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Without P fertilization, rice produced no panicles or grain.

    Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Interactions in Upland Rice · 2014

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Broadcast and split prilled urea left 11 to 35% of applied nitrogen unrecovered at harvest.

    Nitrogen‐15 Balance and Residual Effects of Urea‐N in Wetland Rice Fields as Affected by Deep Placement Techniques · 1984

    Opposite direction

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.