Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Earlier winter irrigation and all basal N increased dry weight per plant.

A claim from Effects of Winter Irrigation Date and Nitrogen Fertilization on the Growth,Water and Nutrient Use Efficiencies in Winter Wheat under Straw Return to Field · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier winter irrigation and all basal N increased dry weight per plant.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
winter irrigation earlier and total N application as basale0
Outcome
Dry weight per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight per plant was increased by winter irrigation earlier and total N application as basal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–927
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126

Title

Effects of Winter Irrigation Date and Nitrogen Fertilization on the Growth,Water and Nutrient Use Efficiencies in Winter Wheat under Straw Return to Field

Dang Jianyo Mailei zuowu xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a10deb359551174c157b98a4f7832bcd5c420a67eaf6f2e8e8776293fbc3a90d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this claim · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

542 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.