Claim · model-written summary
Later summer annual weeds were controlled with either one late or middle mowing or two mowings (early and late).
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- one late or “middle” mowing or two mowingse3
- Interactor
- summer annual weedse3weed
- Outcome
- summer annual weeds were controllede3
- Direction
- controllede3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“later summer annual weeds were controlled with either one late or “middle” mowing or two mowings”
t0“No-till Corn”
Title
William W. Donald Weed Technology 2007. doi:10.1614/wt-05-141.1
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect In two of three years in Missouri, between-row mowing systems controlled and reduced winter annual and summer annual weed cover in no-till corn.
- Intervention effect Between-row mowing systems prevented weeds from reducing corn yields.
- Intervention effect Corn yields equaled the weed-free check for winter annual weed control with between-row mowing plus banded glyphosate at 1.1 kg ae/ha followed by summer annual weed control with banded atrazine plus S-metolachlor at 2.2 plus 1.8 kg ai/ha and between-row mowing.
- Intervention effect Winter annual weeds growing between rows were controlled with one mowing.
- Observation Total herbicide use was reduced by 50% in no-till corn.
- Recommendation Commercially acceptable corn stands were needed for between-row mowing systems to control weeds adequately.
- Intervention effect In one of three years, when corn stands were half those of the other two years, broadcast herbicides performed better than between-row mowing systems in no-till corn.