Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Later summer annual weeds were controlled with either one late or middle mowing or two mowings (early and late).

A claim from Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later summer annual weeds were controlled with either one late or middle mowing or two mowings (early and late).

Treatment
one late or “middle” mowing or two mowingse3
Interactor
summer annual weedse3weed
Outcome
summer annual weeds were controllede3
Direction
controllede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“later summer annual weeds were controlled with either one late or “middle” mowing or two mowings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1243
t0

“No-till Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69

Title

Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems

William W. Donald Weed Technology 2007. doi:10.1614/wt-05-141.1

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a12958c7a92b9cd7b8b6102376d0ff09964abfc615fbf81b891bdef431179575 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pruning · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.