Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Corn yields equaled the weed-free check for winter annual weed control with between-row mowing plus banded glyphosate at 1.1 kg ae/ha followed by summer annual weed control with banded atrazine plus S-metolachlor at 2.2 plus 1.8 kg ai/ha and between-row mowing.

A claim from Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields equaled the weed-free check for winter annual weed control with between-row mowing plus banded glyphosate at 1.1 kg ae/ha followed by summer annual weed control with banded atrazine plus S-metolachlor at 2.2 plus 1.8 kg ai/ha and between-row mowing.

Treatment
winter annual weed control with between-row mowing plus preplant, banded, postemergence-applied glyphosate at 1.1 kg ae/ha and later summer annual weed control with postplant, banded, preemergence-applied atrazine plus S-metolachlor at 2.2 plus 1.8 kg ai/ha followed by between-row mowinge1
Outcome
Corn yieldse1
Direction
equalede1
Comparator
weed-free checke1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn yields for the following no-till weed management systems equaled the weed-free check: winter annual weed control with between-row mowing plus preplant, banded, postemergence-applied glyphosate at 1.1 kg ae/ha and later summer annual weed control with postplant, banded, preemergence-applied atrazine plus S-metolachlor at 2.2 plus 1.8 kg ai/ha followed by between-row mowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–1067

Title

Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems

William W. Donald Weed Technology 2007. doi:10.1614/wt-05-141.1

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-6adcb1b375e8036cd147b396acce1e0f16a96f010578d9bdbf95ca2115ee1e84 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 86 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

165 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.