Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Banded preemergence herbicide plus one late mowing was statistically indistinguishable from the weed-free check for weed control, weed cover and corn yield.

A claim from Preemergence Banded Herbicides Followed by Only One Between-Row Mowing Controls Weeds in Corn · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded preemergence herbicide plus one late mowing was statistically indistinguishable from the weed-free check for weed control, weed cover and corn yield.

Treatment
banded PRE herbicide was followed by only one between-row mowinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
rated total weed control, between-row total weed cover, and corn yielde0
Direction
statistically indistinguishablee0
Comparator
weed-free checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on rated total weed control, between-row total weed cover, and corn yield, the weed-free check was statistically indistinguishable from a treatment in which banded PRE herbicide was followed by only one between-row mowing, late, when weeds were relatively large”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–746
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

Title

Preemergence Banded Herbicides Followed by Only One Between-Row Mowing Controls Weeds in Corn

William W. Donald Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-04-329r2.1

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ae1febab2ed0a61d5d6a644f6dd0a1d036fd99f024a67b61241f97cc9016f0d9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

pruning · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    In two of three years in Missouri, between-row mowing systems controlled and reduced winter annual and summer annual weed cover in no-till corn.

    Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems · 2007

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  2. positive
    Mowing before corn planting prevented weed growth.

    Subterranean Clover Management to Enhance Reseeding in Silage Corn Production. · 2001

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Plots mulched with pruning from the three trees had a lower weed seed bank in the first year of cropping than unmulched plots.

    Weed seed bank size and composition in an arable crop mulched with pruning from three multipurpose trees in southwestern Nigeria · 1999 · compared with unmulched plots

    No difference from an alternative

  4. no effect
    Between-row mowing or tilling was equally effective as hoeing for corn yield, visual weed control rating and weed ground cover.

    Alternative Ways to Control Weeds Between Rows in Weeded Check Plots in Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max)1 · 2000 · compared with Hoeing

    Same direction

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 360 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Combining herbicides and mechanical weeding generally improved weed control compared with mechanical measures alone.

    Integrating Reduced Herbicide Use with Mechanical Weeding in Corn (Zea mays) · 1993 · compared with only mechanical measures

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
    One cultivation plus banded herbicides maintained weed control at two of three sites.

    Banded Herbicide Applications and Cultivation in a Modified No-till Corn (Zea mays) System · 1992

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. positive
    The 38-cm herbicide band had less weed growth than the 19-cm band.

    HIGH-SPEED CULTIVATION AND BANDING FOR WEED MANAGEMENT IN NO-TILL CORN · 2000 · compared with 19-cm (7.5-in.) bandtreatment

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  4. positive
    PRE plus POST herbicides nearly or completely eliminated weed biomass in all cover systems.

    Cover Crops for Herbicide Replacement in No-tillage Corn (Zea mays) · 1996

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    GMHT maize significantly increased seed rain important to seven bird species.

    Weed seed resources for birds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops · 2006 · compared with conventional

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Atrazine pre-emergence followed by hoeing reduced weed density by 58 and 67% in years 1 and 2 versus the sole chemical approach.

    Integrated Weed and Nutrient Management Improve Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Maize in the Rice-Maize Cropping System of Eastern India · 2020 · compared with sole chemical approach

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Applications at 5, 10, or 15 cm weed height gave nearly complete weed control.

    Timing of Total Postemergence Herbicide Applications to Maximize Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays)Yield · 1995

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    Reduced herbicide treatments often controlled weeds as well as the standard full-rate treatment before cultivation.

    Integrating Mechanical Weeding with Reduced Herbicide Use in Conservation Tillage Corn Production Systems · 1995 · compared with standard full‐rate treatment

    No difference from an alternative

397 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.