Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 1:3 straw to leaf treatment raised corn grain yield 32.04% over no straw return.

A claim from The Impact of Combining Robinia pseudoacacia Leaves and Corn Straw on Soil Carbon Content and Corn Yield in Loess Plateau · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1:3 straw to leaf treatment raised corn grain yield 32.04% over no straw return.

Treatment
corn straw and Robinia pseudoacacia leaves returned to the field in a mass ratio of 1:3(Y1C3)e0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.04%e0
Comparator
not returning straw to the fielde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Yield in Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121
e0

“Compared to not returning straw to the field, the corn straw and Robinia pseudoacacia leaves returned to the field in a mass ratio of 1:3(Y1C3) can increase corn grain yield by 32.04%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1426

Title

The Impact of Combining Robinia pseudoacacia Leaves and Corn Straw on Soil Carbon Content and Corn Yield in Loess Plateau

Hanyu Liu; Jianjian Liu; Zhenjiao Zhang; et al. Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14040689

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a270dfcb8b8da7bd5d1c9310ebcfe7a7f38d3b188f34f60f49e9d556bf57590e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this claim · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

283 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.