Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cattle manure did not suppress WSSM incidence.

A claim from CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPPRESSION OF WHEAT SPINDLE STREAK MOSAIC BY NITROGEN FERTILIZERS · 1973

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure did not suppress WSSM incidence.

Treatment
cattle manuree0
Outcome
WSSMe1
Direction
note0
Value
1,000 kg N/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not by cattle manure supplying up to 1,000 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–341
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39
e1

“did not suppress the development of WSSM on plants that were inoculated manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–577

Title

CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPPRESSION OF WHEAT SPINDLE STREAK MOSAIC BY NITROGEN FERTILIZERS

J. T. SLYKHUIS Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1973. doi:10.4141/cjps73-091

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a2b7ce7784d08ba285c41f4d05553b24ee5b0f6c7ef4c3996eb5dff2b7c63462 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.