Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Humic acid increased phosphorus utilization efficiency in maize rhizosphere soil.

A claim from Effect of Different Fertilization Treatments on Phosphorus Utilization in Maize Rhizosphere Soil · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased phosphorus utilization efficiency in maize rhizosphere soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
humic acide0
Outcome
phosphorus utilization efficiency in maize rhizosphere soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available phosphorus content and phosphorus utilization efficiency in maize rhizosphere soil increased after the application of humic acid and microbial fertilizer,and the effect was more obvious at maturity stage than at jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–515

Title

Effect of Different Fertilization Treatments on Phosphorus Utilization in Maize Rhizosphere Soil

Zhihong Li T'u Jang T'ung Pao 2011

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-a2c84d04f73669122ae688f01ee6cee6ab57ce1ce7463af4cab893dc8e97b4fc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

other · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Treatments with CZ had nutrient uptake and agronomic efficiency similar to treatments without CZ.

    Effects of clinoptilolite zeolite on phosphorus dynamics and yield of Zea Mays L. cultivated on an acid soil · 2018 · compared with without CZ

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Urease inhibitors combined with humic substances in treated urea did not improve maize nitrogen use efficiency during vegetative stages.

    15 N-Urea Efficiency in Maize as Influenced by Humic Substances and Urease Inhibitors Treatments · 2018

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Humic acid with NBPT decreased nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency compared with NBPT alone.

    [Application effect of high efficiency and stability urea added with biochemical inhibitors and humic acid in loess]. · 2021 · compared with NBPT alone

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Silicon amendment enhanced maize agronomic efficiency and N uptake.

    Silicon Amendment Enhances Agronomic Efficiency of Nitrogen Fertilization in Maize and Wheat Crops under Tropical Conditions · 2021

    Same direction

  5. positive
    CDAP plus HA improved PUE over DAP alone or DAP plus HA.

    Coated Diammonium Phosphate Combined With Humic Acid Improves Soil Phosphorus Availability and Photosynthesis and the Yield of Maize · 2021 · compared with DAP alone or DAP combined with HA

    Same direction

  6. positive
    CRU + FA treatment increased NUE by 38.4%.

    Controlled‐release urea combined with fulvic acid enhanced carbon/nitrogen metabolic processes and maize growth · 2021

    Same direction

  7. positive
    An appropriate concentration of fulvic acid improves nitrogen use efficiency of maize.

    Fulvic acid alleviates the stress of low nitrogen on maize by promoting root development and nitrogen metabolism · 2024

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Adding acidified amendments and MN54 to phosphorus fertilizers improved maize fertilizer use efficiency versus fertilizer alone.

    Bio-Organically Acidified Product-Mediated Improvements in Phosphorus Fertilizer Utilization, Uptake and Yielding of Zea mays in Calcareous Soil · 2023 · compared with sole application of P fertilizers

    Same direction

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.