Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Incorporated imazaquin plus metribuzin at 90 plus 280 g ai/ha controlled more cocklebur than higher unincorporated rates.

A claim from Incorporation Depths of Imazaquin, Metribuzin, and Chlorimuron for Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Control in Soybeans (Glycine max) · 1989

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated imazaquin plus metribuzin at 90 plus 280 g ai/ha controlled more cocklebur than higher unincorporated rates.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment
tank mix of imazaquin plus metribuzin at 90 plus 280 g ai/hae1
Interactor
common cocklebure1weed
Outcome
common cocklebure1
Direction
controlled moree1
Comparator
higher rates of the same combination when not incorporatede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybeans (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–139
e1

“imazaquin at 90 g ai/ha and the tank mix of imazaquin plus metribuzin at 90 plus 280 g ai/ha, when incorporated, controlled more common cocklebur than higher rates of the same combination when not incorporated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–757

Title

Incorporation Depths of Imazaquin, Metribuzin, and Chlorimuron for Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Control in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Richard A. Wesley; David R. Shaw; William L. Barrentine Weed Science 1989. doi:10.1017/s0043174500072465

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-a2d8f834bac004395adfc744f3be823d149a58ef793cf805d7db5ec26a2a9db7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

imazaquin · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Imazaquin had little or no effect on sicklepod interference with soybean.

    Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) Interference with Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivars Following Herbicide Treatments · 1997

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Adding imazaquin at 70 g/ha to AC 263,222 in a tank mixture did not increase soybean response compared with AC 263,222 alone.

    Response of Soybean (Glycine max) and Rice (Oryza sativa) in Rotation to AC 263,222 · 1995 · compared with AC 263,222 alone

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Early POST herbicide application controlled wild poinsettia better than late application in only one year.

    Soybean (Glycine max) Yield and Quality Responses Associated with Wild Poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) Control Programs · 1993 · compared with late POST applications (10 to 15 cm)

    Same direction

  4. positive
    MON 13200 plus imazaquin applied 45 or 30 d before planting controlled 92 to 99% of giant foxtail compared with alachlor, metolachlor or pendimethalin plus imazaquin.

    MON 13200 Early Preplant Controls Giant Foxtail (Setaria Faberi) Season-Long in No-Till Soybean (Glycine Max) · 1993 · compared with alachlor, metolachlor, or pendimethalin plus imazaquin

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Pre-emergence imazaquin was selective on soybean at 0.18 kg/ha.

    Integrated Weed Control Management in Soybeans (Glycine max) in Greece · 1994

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Preplant incorporated metolachlor plus imazaquin controlled more than 85% of red rice in soybeans.

    Red Rice (Oryza sativa) Control in Soybeans (Glycine max) · 1989

    Same direction

See all 7 papers →

metribuzin · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Metribuzin controlled prickly sida and hemp sesbania more effectively than chlorimuron.

    Metribuzin and Chlorimuron Mixtures for Preemergence Broadleaf Weed Control in Soybeans,Glycine max · 1988 · compared with chlorimuron

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Preemergence mixtures without postemergence fomesafen controlled resistant Palmer amaranth less than 30%.

    Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Soybean with Glyphosate and Conventional Herbicide Systems · 2010

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Clomazone plus metribuzin produced additive or synergistic soybean responses in some field environments regardless of atrazine rate.

    Response of Soybean to Combinations of Clomazone, Metribuzin, Linuron, Alachlor, and Atrazine · 1992

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Metribuzin was more injurious to soybeans than linuron.

    Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Management in Soybeans (Glycine max) · 1983 · compared with linuron

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Adding dicamba or metribuzin to the diflufenican-containing premixture did not reduce Palmer amaranth or waterhemp density at 28 or 56 DAT.

    Comparison of a diflufenican-containing premixture to current commercial standards for residual Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) control · 2024 · compared with DFF-containing premixture

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Metribuzin followed by AC 263,222 was no more injurious than AC 263,222 alone.

    Improving Soybean (Glycine Max) Tolerance to AC 263,222 by Limiting Terminal Exposure · 1994 · compared with AC 263,222

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    All herbicides except metribuzin delayed 10 cm Palmer amaranth.

    Efficacy of residual herbicides influenced by cover-crop residue for control ofAmaranthus palmeriandA. tuberculatusin soybean · 2020 · compared with this treatment

    Same direction

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.