Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil mulching with marc compost had a positive influence on grape production compared with classical solutions.

A claim from The impact of some innovative technological solutions on the quantity and quality of the grape production · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil mulching with marc compost had a positive influence on grape production compared with classical solutions.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
soil mulching with marc composte1
Outcome
grape productione1
Direction
positive influencee1
Comparator
classical technological solutionse5
Setting
Valea Calugareasca viticultural centere6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“The results obtained showed the positive influence on grape production induced by the soil mulching with marc compost, the integrated protection system and the mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–819
e5

“Compared to the classical technological solutions, the new solutions experimented on were the integrated protection system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–499
e6

“The experiment, carried out during 2018-2019 in Valea Calugareasca viticultural center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86

Title

The impact of some innovative technological solutions on the quantity and quality of the grape production

Lidia Fîciu; Adrian Șerdinescu; Liliana Pîrcălabu Romanian journal of Horticulture 2022. doi:10.51258/rjh.2022.24

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a50ccbdffeed838c189b2523510082b88a9072c50d73d67d2db8c1562fdf4c51 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

mulching · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.