Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined calcium and boron application increased peanut production by 19.72% compared with no application.

A claim from Study on the Proper Combined Application of Calcium and Boron to Peanuts · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Combined calcium and boron application increased peanut production by 19.72% compared with no application.

Treatment
applying calcium 450kg/hm 2 and boron 8.8kg/hm 2e0
Outcome
peanut productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.72%e0
Comparator
withoat applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying calcium 450kg/hm 2 and boron 8.8kg/hm 2,the peanut production will reach 3915kg/hm 2, increased by 19.72% than withoat application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–346

Title

Study on the Proper Combined Application of Calcium and Boron to Peanuts

Zhai Su Journal of Henan Vocation-technical Teachers College 2001

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-a5bc98a3e3fe0d80e88dd4f822302dcd818934f5da3b1cfca2995eb8942aa221 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

boron atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

74 papers: 68 positive, 6 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.