Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Selected foliar preparations did not increase net photosynthesis intensity.

A claim from The Effect of the Foliar Application of Biostimulants and Fertilisers on the Growth and Physiological Parameters of Maiden Apple Trees Cultivated with Limited Mineral Fertilisation · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected foliar preparations did not increase net photosynthesis intensity.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
foliar application of selected preparationse0
Outcome
net photosynthesis intensitye0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of selected preparations intensified the leaf transpiration coefficient and the internal concentration of carbon dioxide, but it did not increase the net photosynthesis intensity or stomatal conductance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1549
t0

“The Effect of the Foliar Application of Biostimulants and Fertilisers on the Growth and Physiological Parameters of Maiden Apple Trees Cultivated with Limited Mineral Fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–180

Title

The Effect of the Foliar Application of Biostimulants and Fertilisers on the Growth and Physiological Parameters of Maiden Apple Trees Cultivated with Limited Mineral Fertilisation

Sławomir Świerczyński; Agnieszka Antonowicz; Joanna Bykowska Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11061216

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-a69a911d87eeb1b21ae71f3a21659ad0e1b89eae9d75af423210438d1cc3dfa6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 9 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.