Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined low-input P strategy improved P use efficiency in maize.

A claim from Banded application of single superphosphate and ammonium sulfate enhances phosphorus-use efficiency and maize productivity on the Loess Plateau of China · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined low-input P strategy improved P use efficiency in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
42 % reduction in P fertilization combined with banded application of superphosphate and ammonium sulfatee7
Outcome
P use efficiencye7
Direction
improvese7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Our results demonstrate that a tailored, low-input P management strategy, involving a 42 % reduction in P fertilization combined with banded application of superphosphate and ammonium sulfate enhances yield, improves P use efficiency, and optimizes soil conditions under maize dryland farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1969–2261
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–122

Title

Banded application of single superphosphate and ammonium sulfate enhances phosphorus-use efficiency and maize productivity on the Loess Plateau of China

Yu Yang; Xiaoyu Liu; Qin Ma; et al. Field Crops Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2026.110327

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-a8216ce5decd56724f5eccba191a7c3b45d559395662379dde982b13d076e492 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.