Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Si in Cd-contaminated acidic solution promoted wheat root growth versus Cd alone.

A claim from Alleviatory effects of Silicon on the morphology, physiology, and antioxidative mechanisms of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots under cadmium stress in acidic nutrient solutions · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si in Cd-contaminated acidic solution promoted wheat root growth versus Cd alone.

Treatment
Si (1 or 3 mmol L −1 ) in Cd-contaminated acidic nutrient solutione0
Outcome
wheat root growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
Cd single treatments in acidic pHe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incorporation of Si (1 or 3 mmol L −1 ) in Cd-contaminated acidic nutrient solution promoted the wheat root growth, decreased ROS contents, and further increased the antioxidants in the wheat roots compared with Cd single treatments in acidic pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1738

Title

Alleviatory effects of Silicon on the morphology, physiology, and antioxidative mechanisms of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots under cadmium stress in acidic nutrient solutions

Shafeeq ur Rahman; Qi Xuebin; Zhijuan Zhao; et al. Scientific Reports 2021. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80808-x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-aa7690c4a24efb6a3dc94fa989e5dcf5201492f35f980d196547989fdf14407e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

746 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.