Paper · 2026 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Rice Husk-derived Biogenic Nano-silica: Effects on Wheat Growth and Oxidative Stress Mechanisms under Drought Conditions

Sevval Ozturk; Ozge Sahin; Aydın Gunes

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The agronomic efficiency of conventional silicon (Si) fertilizers is frequently limited by their low bioavailability in soil. Consequently, nano-silica (nano-Si) has gained increasing attention as a sustainable alternative due to its enhanced availability and potentially superior physiological effectiveness in plants. The present study aimed to synthesize nano-Si from rice husk (RH), and its effects on growth, oxidative stress responses, and nutrient status of durum wheat. Nano-Si was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). SEM observations showed a hierarchical structure consisting of micro-scale porous frameworks formed by agglomerated nano-sized primary particles lower than 80 nm, while largely preserving the native siliceous architecture. FTIR and XRD analyses confirmed that the material was predominantly amorphous Si with characteristic Si-O-Si functional groups. A pot experiment was conducted in which nano-Si and sodium silicate were applied at rates of 0, 25, 50, and 100 mg kg − 1 to wheat plants grown under drought conditions. Applied Si did not significantly influence total dry weight; however, grain yield responded strongly to nano-Si, with the highest yield recorded at 25 mg kg − 1 . This treatment also resulted in higher chlorophyll content and relative water content, along with lower H 2 O 2 accumulation and membrane permeability, and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, particularly ascorbate peroxidase. In contrast, sodium silicate produced weaker physiological responses and was associated with increased H 2 O 2 levels. Nano-Si application increased plant Si and P concentrations. Nano-Si outperformed Na-Si in improving grain yield, photosynthesis, water relations, and oxidative stress tolerance in wheat, indicating its potential as a sustainable Si fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied silicon did not significantly affect wheat total dry weight.

Treatment
Applied Sie0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
did not significantly influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied Si did not significantly influence total dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Si at 25 mg kg − 1 gave the highest grain yield.

Treatment
nano-Sie0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25 mg kg − 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield responded strongly to nano-Si, with the highest yield recorded at 25 mg kg − 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 mg kg − 1 nano-Si treatment raised chlorophyll content and relative water content.

Treatment
Nano-silicat0
Outcome
chlorophyll content and relative water contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also resulted in higher chlorophyll content and relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Husk-derived Biogenic Nano-silica: Effects on Wheat Growth and Oxidative Stress Mechanisms under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment lowered H 2 O 2 accumulation and membrane permeability.

Treatment
Nano-silicat0
Outcome
H 2 O 2 accumulation and membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower H 2 O 2 accumulation and membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Husk-derived Biogenic Nano-silica: Effects on Wheat Growth and Oxidative Stress Mechanisms under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nano-silica treatment enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, especially ascorbate peroxidase.

Treatment
Nano-silicat0
Gene
ascorbate peroxidasee0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, particularly ascorbate peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Husk-derived Biogenic Nano-silica: Effects on Wheat Growth and Oxidative Stress Mechanisms under Drought Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate produced weaker physiological responses.

Treatment
sodium silicatee0
Outcome
physiological responsese0
Direction
weakere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium silicate produced weaker physiological responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate was associated with increased H 2 O 2 levels.

Treatment
sodium silicatee0
Outcome
H 2 O 2 levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium silicate produced weaker physiological responses and was associated with increased H 2 O 2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Si increased wheat silicon concentration.

Treatment
Nano-Si applicatione0
Outcome
Sie0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano-Si application increased plant Si and P concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Si increased wheat phosphorus concentration.

Treatment
Nano-Si applicatione0
Outcome
P concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano-Si application increased plant Si and P concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Si outperformed Na-Si for grain yield, photosynthesis, water relations and oxidative stress tolerance.

Treatment
Nano-Sie0
Outcome
grain yield, photosynthesis, water relations, and oxidative stress tolerancee0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
Na-Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano-Si outperformed Na-Si in improving grain yield, photosynthesis, water relations, and oxidative stress tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1852 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.