Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano fertilizer sprays enhanced soil microbial diversity and community structure.

A claim from Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano fertilizer sprays enhanced soil microbial diversity and community structure.

Taxon
wheat–maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
two foliar sprays of nano-N or nano-N + nano-Zne0
Outcome
soil microbial diversity and the microbial community structuree0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat–maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–129
e0

“two foliar sprays of nano-N or nano-N + nano-Zn curtailed N requirement by 25%, furthermore enhanced soil microbial diversity and the microbial community structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1410

Title

Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system

Pravin Kumar Upadhyay; Abir Dey; Vinod Kumar Singh; et al. Scientific Reports 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-48951-3

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-dcf64cbfb0f45b3aece062dbf4375f91fd56cfd92f04d8df0e7dd89cdf40b6c3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

application · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.