Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Optimized irrigation with traditional fertilization significantly increased root length at 0–30 cm.

A claim from Comparative Study of Root Growth and Distribution of Winter Wheat under Different Models of Irrigation and N Fertilization · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized irrigation with traditional fertilization significantly increased root length at 0–30 cm.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
0~30 cm soil layere0
Treatment
optimized irrigation-traditional fertilization modele0
Outcome
root length per unit areae0
Direction
increased significantlye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For winter wheat under optimized irrigation-traditional fertilization model,root length per unit area in the 0~30 cm soil layer increased significantly(P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–876

Title

Comparative Study of Root Growth and Distribution of Winter Wheat under Different Models of Irrigation and N Fertilization

Marion Boening Mailei zuowu xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-ad23da8490ab6f157fbe32e7e6cc12bb7d1bbeab3a1a0869692eceee2674eb24 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

746 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.