Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip irrigation boosted nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen harvest index in winter wheat compared with surface and micro-sprinkler methods.

A claim from Response of Triticum Vulgare Growth and Nitrogen Allocation to Irrigation Methods and Regimes under Subsoiling Tillage · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation boosted nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen harvest index in winter wheat compared with surface and micro-sprinkler methods.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Drip irrigatione0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen harvest indexe0
Direction
boostse0
Comparator
surface and micro-sprinkler methodse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation boosts winter wheat grain yield, harvest index, biomass transfer amount, biomass transfer rate, nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen harvest index significantly compared to surface and micro-sprinkler methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–983

Title

Response of Triticum Vulgare Growth and Nitrogen Allocation to Irrigation Methods and Regimes under Subsoiling Tillage

Chao Huang; Xuchen Liu; Yang Gao; et al. Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14040858

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-afbcbeaa9166dcc06380dce27b68603ab325892361a249a8e48f149b451e02be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.