Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spring nitrogen increased average plant height by 9.5 cm.

A claim from The influence of mineral nitrogen fertilisers on the formation of winter pea productivity · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring nitrogen increased average plant height by 9.5 cm.

Taxon
winter peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
nitrogen mineral fertilisers in springe0
Outcome
average height of plantse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.5 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nitrogen mineral fertilisers in spring helped to increase the average height of plants by 9.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1358
t0

“winter pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76

Title

The influence of mineral nitrogen fertilisers on the formation of winter pea productivity

I. V. Kovalchuk; N. V. Novytska; O. M. Martynov; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2024. doi:10.47414/na.12.3.2024.308604

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-afd40980093a0fbb23d97dacb68e398ca20ebbc2952f35da0ff545fc7a8b4424 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 19 positive, 16 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Fertilizer N below 40 kg N ha -1 had no significant effect on biomass N at flatpod.

    Inoculant formulation and fertilizer nitrogen effects on field pea: Nodulation, N2 fixation and nitrogen partitioning · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Nitrate decreased the number of infections per centimeter of lateral root.

    Ethylene as a Possible Mediator of Light- and Nitrate-Induced Inhibition of Nodulation of Pisum sativum L. cv Sparkle · 1992

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    A higher maize density and lower N application had no adverse effects on the growth components of pea or maize.

    Agronomic and Economic Benefits of Pea/Maize Intercropping Systems in Relation to N Fertilizer and Maize Density · 2018

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Pea biomass under elevated CO2 was unaffected by nitrogen level.

    Free-air CO2enrichment (FACE) reduces the inhibitory effect of soil nitrate on N2fixation ofPisum sativum · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Changing the site of nitrate reduction did not change growth significantly in pea.

    Growth and nitrogen relations in reciprocal grafts of wild-type and nitrate reductase-deficient mutants of pea (Pisum sativumL. var. Juneau) · 1997

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Pea growth was lower with urea than nitrate.

    Improved Soybean Growth in Urea with pH Buffered by a Carboxy Resin1 · 1976 · compared with nitrate

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Starter nitrogen, especially urea, harmed pea establishment and vigor when initial soil nitrogen was high.

    Efficacy of starter N fertilizer and rhizobia inoculant in dry pea (Pisum sativum Linn.) production in a semi-arid temperate environment · 2017

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    At 0.5 mM nitrogen, relative leaf expansion rate fell 20-30% similarly in both genotypes.

    Leaf area development of ABA-deficient and wild-type peas at two levels of nitrogen supply · 2003

    Opposite direction

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Fertilizer N below 40 kg N ha -1 had no significant effect on biomass N at flatpod.

    Inoculant formulation and fertilizer nitrogen effects on field pea: Nodulation, N2 fixation and nitrogen partitioning · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Spent mushroom compost produced poor seed germination.

    Organic waste compost and spent mushroom compost as potential growing media components for the sustainable production of microgreens · 2023

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    NaCl reduced pea growth under semi-controlled conditions.

    Growth, ion composition, and stomatal conductance of peas exposed to salinity · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Side-banded phosphorus fertilizer reduced seedling emergence at three weeks.

    Field pea response to seeding depth and P fertilization · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Pea, faba bean, lentil and chickpea were the least responsive to starter fertilizer in 30-day biomass, with no benefit above 10 kg N per ha.

    Effect of starter fertilizer in seed-row on emergence, biomass and nutrient uptake by six pulse crops grown under controlled environment conditions · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Some pea varieties maintained similar biomass with and without phosphorus fertilizer.

    Harnessing Phosphorous (P) Fertilizer-Insensitive Bacteria to Enhance Rhizosphere P Bioavailability in Legumes · 2024 · compared with without P fertilization

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Increasing nitrogen doses did not significantly increase vegetative biomass in all cases.

    Interaction between Nutrition and Herbicide Application in Pea Culture · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen fixation per unit pea dry matter was unaffected by fertilisation.

    A low nitrogen fertiliser rate in oat–pea intercrops does not impair N 2 fixation · 2021 · compared with unfertilised control

    Opposite direction

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.