Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spring nitrogen increased 1000-kernel weight by 19.7 g.

A claim from The influence of mineral nitrogen fertilisers on the formation of winter pea productivity · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring nitrogen increased 1000-kernel weight by 19.7 g.

Taxon
winter peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
nitrogen mineral fertilisers in springe0
Outcome
1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
19.7 ge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nitrogen mineral fertilisers in spring helped to increase the average height of plants by 9.5 cm, the number of beans per plant by 1.6, and the 1000-kernel weight by 19.7 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1434
t0

“winter pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76

Title

The influence of mineral nitrogen fertilisers on the formation of winter pea productivity

I. V. Kovalchuk; N. V. Novytska; O. M. Martynov; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2024. doi:10.47414/na.12.3.2024.308604

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-a91aef024320dbe91ecc46c87bc51b2421897146b40b0eb5603c3ab25b113721 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

76 papers: 59 positive, 17 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    High N rates could decrease the LER of barley–pea intercrops and could result in toxic nitrate levels in the forage.

    Row Configuration and Nitrogen Application for Barley–Pea Intercropping in Montana · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Nitrate increased the carbon cost of nitrogenase during days 0–2.

    Involvement of Activated Oxygen in Nitrate-Induced Senescence of Pea Root Nodules · 1996

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Above 80–120 kg ha −1 N, pea production decreased.

    NITROGEN FIXATION OF GRAIN LEGUMES DIFFERS IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILISATION · 2016

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Ammonium nutrition alone had no negative effect on pea biomass production.

    Replacement of nitrate by ammonium as the nitrogen source increases the salt sensitivity of pea plants. I. Ion concentrations in roots and leaves · 1994

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Starter nitrogen, especially urea, harmed pea seed yield when initial soil nitrogen was high.

    Efficacy of starter N fertilizer and rhizobia inoculant in dry pea (Pisum sativum Linn.) production in a semi-arid temperate environment · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Seed yield decreased with 100 ppm N.

    Nitrogen Effects on Growth, Seed Yield, and Protein of Seven Pea Cultivars1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    High nitrogen (80 kg/ha) did not increase pea yield compared with 16 kg/ha.

    Breeding of a protein pea ideotype for Finnish conditions · 1988 · compared with 16 kg/ha level

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    N fertilization decreased nutrient harvest indices in pea.

    Concentrations and uptake of micronutrients by oat and pea in intercrops in response to N fertilization and sowing ratio · 2016

    Opposite direction

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    PP+CMP decreased pea fresh yield by 14.9%.

    Organic waste compost and spent mushroom compost as potential growing media components for the sustainable production of microgreens · 2023 · compared with PP

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Pea yield did not respond significantly to Zn fertilization on any of five soils.

    Response of wheat, pea, and canola to micronutrient fertilization on five contrasting prairie soils · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fertilizer treatment had no effect on total dry matter and grain yields in the intercropping and sole crop trials

    Comparison of resilience of different plant teams to drought and temperature extremes in Denmark in sole and intercropping systems · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    In 1991, inoculation with P. bila/1 or P fertilizer had little consistent effect on pea grain yield.

    Response of pea and lentil to inoculation with the phosphate-solubilizing fungus Penicillium bilaii (Provide™) · 1993

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Foliar fertilizer had a negative impact on the harvest index compared with the control.

    The value of different vegetative indices (NDVI, GAI) for the assessment of yield potential of pea (Pisum sativum L.) at different growth stages and under varying management practices · 2018 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Fertilizer N application produced no yield response.

    The influence of selected agronomic factors on the yield of forage peas · 1982

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Nitrogen fertilizer reduced pea yield.

    Intercropping for enhanced yield stability and food security · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Nitrogen fertilizer application significantly reduced pea grain yield.

    The interacting effects of irrigation, sowing date and nitrogen on water status, protein and yield in pea (Pisum sativum L.) · 2022

    Opposite direction

231 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.