Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under high N, rice leaf N concentration did not increase further.

A claim from Divergent responses of leaf N:P:K stoichiometry to nitrogen fertilization in rice and weeds · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high N, rice leaf N concentration did not increase further.

Treatment
high N inputs (360 kg N ha −1 )e1
Outcome
Rice leaf N concentration [N]e0
Direction
did not increase furthere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice leaf N concentration [N] did not increase further, and N:P ratios even decreased, whereas E. crus-galli and M. korsakowii had significantly increased [N] and N-related stoichiometry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1250
e1

“The opposite trend was found for high N inputs (360 kg N ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1062

Title

Divergent responses of leaf N:P:K stoichiometry to nitrogen fertilization in rice and weeds

Xiao Sun; Jiuxin Guo; Shiwei Guo; et al. Weed Science 2019. doi:10.1017/wsc.2019.7

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-b00809dc867a2ee247d41456c683a68fe3455f3788cb955344a8655d2d7e7978 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this claim · 408 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

455 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.