Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Neem oil 3% was among the least effective treatments against fall armyworm larval population, with a value of 10.24.

A claim from Evaluation of Beauveria Bassiana, Neem Oil and Selected Insecticides on Population of Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 3% was among the least effective treatments against fall armyworm larval population, with a value of 10.24.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Neem oil 3%e2
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae6pest
Outcome
larval populatione6
Direction
least effectivee2
Value
10.24e2
Comparator
untreated controle5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Beauveria Bassiana, Neem Oil and Selected Insecticides on Population of Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158
e2

“Neem oil 3% (10.24) and B. bassiana 1x108 CFU/ml (10.93) were of least effective against Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–902
e5

“untreated control in three replication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–368
e6

“The larval population of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E.Smith) on three, seven and fourteen days after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–536

Title

Evaluation of Beauveria Bassiana, Neem Oil and Selected Insecticides on Population of Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)

Rakesh Girishgouda Patil; Anoorag R. Tayde International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2331594

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-b03074cbbd7ff4c8f2afb68974b92baf6f0670d4b0e671e4a827f371557a789c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.