Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Females laid more eggs on controls than areas treated with corn leaf extract.

A claim from Chemical and Tactile Cues Influencing Oviposition of a Generalist Moth, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Females laid more eggs on controls than areas treated with corn leaf extract.

Treatment
leaf extracts of corn, cotton, and tomatoe0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
females ovipositede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
control arease0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, females oviposited more on control areas than on areas treated with leaf extracts of corn, cotton, and tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–369
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93

Title

Chemical and Tactile Cues Influencing Oviposition of a Generalist Moth, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Julio C. Rojas; Armando Virgen; Leopoldo Cruz-López Environmental Entomology 2003. doi:10.1603/0046-225x-32.6.1386

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2e27b740cd28a3607305a6e6ee2cfbc828a75ac2e0a885221b81e468716a06c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.