Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat above ground biomass increased with nitrogen rate and full irrigation.

A claim from Effects of irrigation levels and nitrogen fertilizer rate on grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) at Amibara, Middle Awash, Ethiopia · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat above ground biomass increased with nitrogen rate and full irrigation.

Treatment
increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer and the full application of irrigatione0
Outcome
above ground biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“above ground biomass and grain yield of wheat increased with the increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer and the full application of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–834

Title

Effects of irrigation levels and nitrogen fertilizer rate on grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) at Amibara, Middle Awash, Ethiopia

M. Hassen Jemal; R. Borena Fikadu; N. Tufa Kebede; et al. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 2022. doi:10.5897/jssem2021.0903

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-b0a2ccffb7ac55dfb5c651a694c03e62576f8a07f10d8b268aae0c4dc25327ac · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soil water level had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing irrigation water salinity lowered shoot dry matter, particularly without zinc sulfate.

    Salinity and Zinc Application Effects on Phytoavailability of Cadmium and Zinc · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Aboveground biomass was similar under subsurface drip and flood irrigation.

    Water-Saving Potential of Subsurface Drip Irrigation For Winter Wheat · 2019 · compared with flood irrigation

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Two irrigations inhibited root growth into deeper soil layers.

    Irrigation and Nitrogen Regimes Promote the Use of Soil Water and Nitrate Nitrogen from Deep Soil Layers by Regulating Root Growth in Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil water treatment had no effect on kernel growth rate.

    Water and Nitrogen Effects on Winter Wheat in the Southeastern Coastal Plain: I. Grain Yield and Kernel Traits · 1995

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Restricted water supply reduced shoot and root biomass in wheat.

    Early Season Drought Largely Reduces Grain Yield in Wheat Cultivars with Smaller Root Systems · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Crop and water treatment had no significant effect on wheat growth parameters.

    Intercropping of Faba Bean with Wheat Under Low Water Availability Promotes Faba Bean Nodulation and Root Growth in Deeper Soil Layers · 2015

    Opposite direction

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Reducing fertilizer by 25% did not reduce soil nutrient availability or wheat nutrient content, height and dry weight.

    Beneficial bacteria activate nutrients and promote wheat growth under conditions of reduced fertilizer application · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Gibberellic acid reduced root dry weight of wheat, unless applied to the shoots in a lanolin paste.

    The plant‐growth‐promoting properties of gibberellic acid, a metabolic product of the fungus gibberella fujikuroi · 1954

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    fertilizer N rate had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Stagnant solution reduced Gamenya shoot fresh weight by 21%.

    Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs Gamenya and Kite) and triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir) to waterlogging · 1992 · compared with aerated plants

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Urea fertilizer impurities such as biuret do not account for the adverse effect on seed germination in soil.

    Evidence that the adverse effect of urea fertilizer on seed germination in soil is due to ammonia formed through hydrolysis of urea by soil urease · 1989

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Applying more N fertilizer did not improve DM accumulation in winter wheat.

    Understanding Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation with Time-Course for High-Yielding Wheat Production in China · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization did not significantly change rooting pattern.

    Root Development of Winter Wheat as Related to Tillage Practice in Western Nebraska1 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen fertiliser application did not affect wheat rooting depth.

    Rooting depth of wheat in the Victorian Mallee · 1990

    Opposite direction

746 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.