Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 1:4 rabi sorghum–chickpea intercrop had significantly higher grain yield than the other treatments, at 1277 kg ha-1.

A claim from Effect of sara method of in situ moisture conservation practices and intercropping system on yield of rabi sorghum and chickpea · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:4 rabi sorghum–chickpea intercrop had significantly higher grain yield than the other treatments, at 1277 kg ha-1.

Taxon
rabi sorghum and chickpeat0
Treatment
1:4 Rabi sorghum + chickpea intercropping systeme1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
1277 kg ha-1e1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127
e1

“1:4 Rabi sorghum + chickpea intercropping system recorded significantly higher grain yield(1277 kg ha-1) compared to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–891

Title

Effect of sara method of in situ moisture conservation practices and intercropping system on yield of rabi sorghum and chickpea

H.J. Meerasab; M.B. Guled 2013

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b361dddf8db2ab9559ae811775a8d4418d02c53cfdabfdb2aa0f61f69c5c6623 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Cicer arietinum · yield · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    intercropping of chickpea (2:2) + seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 3 g/kg seed raised sorghum grain equivalent yield.

    Evaluation of integrated pest managment components for the management of shoot fly, shoot bug and aphid in rabi sorghum · 2009

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Chickpea inoculation alone increased succeeding fodder sorghum yield by 32.8 percent.

    Residual Effect of Phosphate and Rhizobium inoculation in Chickpea on Succeeding Maize and Fodder Sorghum · 1995

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Jiru relay intercropping gave the highest sorghum grain yield of 4.21 tha-1.

    Evaluating the compatibility of highland sorghum {Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench} varieties for relay-intercropping with chickpea [Cicer Arietinum (L.)] at highland areas of west Hararghe, Ethiopia · 2021

    Same direction

See all 4 papers →

Sorghum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Residual FYM applied to sorghum increased chickpea growth, yield attributes and yield.

    Integrated nutrient management in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)–chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cropping sequence under irrigated conditions · 2006 · compared with 50% RDF

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Residual FYM on sorghum plus full RDF on chickpea increased chickpea grain and bhusa yields significantly.

    Nutrient balance under INMS in sorghum-chickpea cropping sequence · 2007 · compared with 50 per cent RDF to chickpea

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Residual farmyard manure to sorghum increased chickpea growth and yield.

    Integrated nutrient management in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)+hickpea (Cicer arietinum) cropping sequence under irrigated conditions · 2001 · compared with 50% RDF

    Same direction

See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ

165 papers: 118 positive, 47 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Intercropping maize or sorghum with legumes reduced leaf area indices, fresh weight yield at anthesis and straw yield.

    Effects of Intercropping Maize or Sorghum with Cowpeas, Pigeon Peas or Beans · 1973

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Intercropping reduced FS-16 sorghum yield by 14%.

    Relative Yield Totals and Yield Components of Intercropped Sorghum and Soybeans1 · 1978

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Ruziziensis grass intercropping did not reduce sorghum grain yield.

    Performance of Grain Sorghum and Forage of the Genus Brachiaria in Integrated Agricultural Production Systems · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Intercropping with mung bean significantly reduced sweet sorghum grain yield in both seasons except ASR staggered seeding in the dry season.

    Effects of legume type, planting pattern and time of establishment on growth and yield of sweet sorghum-legume intercropping · 2012

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Cowpea intercropping reduced sorghum grain yield by 77–93%.

    Integrating Legumes as Cover Crops and Intercrops into Grain Sorghum Production Systems · 2018 · compared with monocropped sorghum

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Relay forage sorghum yielded 37% of monoculture forage sorghum.

    Multiple Cropping Systems in Small Grains in Northeast Nebraska · 1990 · compared with monoculture forage sorghum

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    At Babile, intercropped sorghum yielded 45% to 89% of sole sorghum.

    Evaluation of Sorghum, Maize and Common Bean Cropping Systems in East Hararghe, eastern Ethiopia. · 2000 · compared with respective sole crops

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Sorghum yields were significantly different among treatments and lowest with a tuber intercrop.

    Effect of cropping systems on cereal stemborers in the cool‐wet and semi‐arid ecozones of the Amhara region of Ethiopia · 2007 · compared with treatments

    Opposite direction

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.