Paper · 1995 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Residual Effect of Phosphate and Rhizobium inoculation in Chickpea on Succeeding Maize and Fodder Sorghum

R.D. Sharma; R. P. Pareek; Ramesh Chandra

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) either alone or in combination enhanced the nodulation and yield significantlv over the uninoculated control for two consecutive years. These treatments also increased the yields of succeeding maize andfodder sorghum crops significantly. Inoculation alone in chickpea produced 26.3 and 32.8 per cent more yields of succeeding maize and fodder sorghum, respectively, showing a residual effect equivalent to 20 kg fertilizer N ha−1. The residual effect of Rhizobium inoculation + P fertilizer was to the tune of 30 and 40 kg N ha−1 in maize and fodder sorghum, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation increased chickpea nodulation and yield over uninoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) either alone or in combination enhanced the nodulation and yield significantlv over the uninoculated control for two consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate application increased chickpea nodulation and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1e0
Outcome
nodulation and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) either alone or in combination enhanced the nodulation and yield significantlv over the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation and phosphate together increased chickpea nodulation and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) either alone or in combination enhanced the nodulation and yield significantlv over the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding chickpea treatments significantly increased succeeding maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
These treatmentse0
Outcome
yields of succeeding maizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also increased the yields of succeeding maize andfodder sorghum crops significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding chickpea treatments significantly increased succeeding fodder sorghum yield.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
These treatmentse0
Outcome
yields of succeeding maize andfodder sorghum cropse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also increased the yields of succeeding maize andfodder sorghum crops significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea inoculation alone increased succeeding maize yield by 26.3 percent.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Inoculation alone in chickpeae0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt0symbiont
Outcome
yields of succeeding maizee0
Direction
moree0
Value
26.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation alone in chickpea produced 26.3 and 32.8 per cent more yields of succeeding maize and fodder sorghum, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium inoculation in Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea inoculation alone increased succeeding fodder sorghum yield by 32.8 percent.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
Inoculation alone in chickpeae0
Outcome
yields of succeeding maize and fodder sorghume0
Direction
moree0
Value
32.8 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation alone in chickpea produced 26.3 and 32.8 per cent more yields of succeeding maize and fodder sorghum, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–464 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual inoculation effect on maize was equivalent to 20 kg fertilizer N per hectare.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
residual effecte0
Value
20 kg fertilizer N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showing a residual effect equivalent to 20 kg fertilizer N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Succeeding Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual inoculation and P fertilizer effect on maize was equivalent to 30 kg N per hectare.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculation + P fertilizere0
Outcome
residual effecte0
Value
30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect of Rhizobium inoculation + P fertilizer was to the tune of 30 and 40 kg N ha−1 in maize and fodder sorghum, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual inoculation and P fertilizer effect on fodder sorghum was equivalent to 40 kg N per hectare.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculation + P fertilizere0
Outcome
residual effecte0
Value
40 kg N ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect of Rhizobium inoculation + P fertilizer was to the tune of 30 and 40 kg N ha−1 in maize and fodder sorghum, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–671 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Cicer arietinum · yield · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

inoculation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 68 positive, 8 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.