Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation increased chickpea nodulation and yield over uninoculated control.

A claim from Residual Effect of Phosphate and Rhizobium inoculation in Chickpea on Succeeding Maize and Fodder Sorghum · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation increased chickpea nodulation and yield over uninoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) either alone or in combination enhanced the nodulation and yield significantlv over the uninoculated control for two consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–234

Title

Residual Effect of Phosphate and Rhizobium inoculation in Chickpea on Succeeding Maize and Fodder Sorghum

R.D. Sharma; R. P. Pareek; Ramesh Chandra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 1995

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c19cac077a9e107c337fc179be9cf48c373efc4212dbc7463dd41a93856261f2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.