Abstract
Field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2011-12 to study the effect on in situ moisture conservationpractice sara border strips versus flat bed in rabi sorghum based cropping systems [sole rabi sorghum, sole chickpea, rabi sorghum + chickpea 2:1, 1:2, 1:4 ratios and Random mixed cropping of rabi sorghum + chickpea (50% recommended seed rate of chickpea) and Random mixed cropping of rabi sorghum + chickpea (75% recommended seed rate of chickpea)] under rainfed vertisols at RARS, Bijapur. The results revealed that among the in situ moisture conservation practices, sara border strips recorded higher grain yield, moisture use efficiency, sorghum equivalent yield and found to be highly economical. Among all the intercropping systems, 1:4 Rabi sorghum + chickpea intercropping system recorded significantly higher grain yield(1277 kg ha-1) compared to rest of the treatments
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Sara border strips increased grain yield in the sorghum-based system.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“rabi sorghum and chickpea”
e0“sara border strips recorded higher grain yield, moisture use efficiency, sorghum equivalent yield and found to be highly economical.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sara border strips increased moisture use efficiency in the sorghum-based system.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“rabi sorghum and chickpea”
e0“sara border strips recorded higher grain yield, moisture use efficiency, sorghum equivalent yield and found to be highly economical.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sara border strips increased sorghum equivalent yield in the sorghum-based system.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“rabi sorghum and chickpea”
e0“sara border strips recorded higher grain yield, moisture use efficiency, sorghum equivalent yield and found to be highly economical.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sara border strips were highly economical.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
t0“rabi sorghum and chickpea”
e0“sara border strips recorded higher grain yield, moisture use efficiency, sorghum equivalent yield and found to be highly economical.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1:4 rabi sorghum–chickpea intercrop had significantly higher grain yield than the other treatments, at 1277 kg ha-1.
Verbatim
t0“rabi sorghum and chickpea”
e1“1:4 Rabi sorghum + chickpea intercropping system recorded significantly higher grain yield(1277 kg ha-1) compared to rest of the treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Cicer arietinum · yield · SorghumResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Sorghum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
161 papers more in this group
See all 165 papers →intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.