Claim · model-written summary
Spring N application did not greatly reduce white clover production in this experiment.
- Taxon
- white clover
Trifolium repense1 - Treatment
- Spring N applicatione1
- Outcome
- white clover productione1
- Direction
- did not greatly reducee1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Spring N application did not greatly reduce white clover production in this experiment”
Title
J. FRAME; D. J. PATERSON Grass and Forage Science 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1987.tb02116.x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Spring N application increased total herbage DM production of the ryegrass/white clover sward, with a mean response of 15.2 kg DM per kg applied N.
- Intervention effect Spring N application reduced white clover DM production, but not significantly.
- Intervention effect One silage cut in the sward system increased total herbage DM by 9% relative to the basic six-harvest system.
- Intervention effect Two silage cuts in the sward system increased total herbage DM by 14% relative to the basic six-harvest system.
- Recommendation Grass/white clover swards are suitable for management systems that involve cutting for conservation.