Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased wheat dry weight.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- inoculation with Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- dry weight of wheat plantse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- uninoculatione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with Azotobacter alone led to a significant increase in dry weight of wheat plants and weight of spike compared to uninoculation”
Title
H. A. Abdel Aziz Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2014. doi:10.21608/jssae.2014.49098
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased spike weight.
- Intervention effect Increasing proline spray generally increased wheat growth and dry weight across irrigation levels.
- Intervention effect Increasing proline spray generally increased wheat spike weight.
- Intervention effect A 30 ppm proline spray gave the highest plant dry matter yield in most cases.
- Intervention effect A 30 ppm proline spray gave the highest spike dry matter yield in most cases.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen uptake decreased with increasing irrigation water salinity.
- Intervention effect At 6 dS m-1 salinity, nitrogen uptake decreased severely.
- Intervention effect At 2 and 4 dS m-1 salinity, nitrogen uptake decreased gradually relative to control.
- Intervention effect Proline additions slowed the adverse effect of saline irrigation.
- Intervention effect Proline at 30 ppm enhanced nitrogen uptake more than 15 ppm.