Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IAA priming improved seedling root length, height and biomass.

A claim from IAA priming improves the germination and seedling growth in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) via regulating the endogenous phytohormones and enhancing the sucrose metabolism · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA priming improved seedling root length, height and biomass.

Treatment
IAA priminge0
Outcome
root length, seedling height, biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66
e0

“seedlings from seeds with IAA priming showed more vigor growth with improved root length, seedling height, biomass and leaf photosynthesis capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1189

Title

IAA priming improves the germination and seedling growth in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) via regulating the endogenous phytohormones and enhancing the sucrose metabolism

Tianlun Zhao; Xiaolei Deng; Qinzhi Xiao; et al. Industrial Crops and Products 2020. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112788

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b3f8dea90f5cd64f34bcc73c8f775669cecdac3b8035d185d35c2184faf1e4a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.