Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FIRB sowing gave the maximum wheat yield of 4.34 t ha −1 relative to flat row and zero tillage sowing.

A claim from Innovative organic nutrient management and land arrangements improve soil health and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in an organic farming system · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB sowing gave the maximum wheat yield of 4.34 t ha −1 relative to flat row and zero tillage sowing.

Treatment
furrow irrigated raised bed sowing (FIRB)e0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.34 t ha −1e0
Comparator
flat row sowing and zero tillage sowinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the furrow irrigated raised bed sowing (FIRB) method resulted in the maximum wheat yield (4.34 t ha −1 ) compared with flat row sowing and zero tillage sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1386

Title

Innovative organic nutrient management and land arrangements improve soil health and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in an organic farming system

Adarsh Sharma; S. K. Sharma; Latika Vyas; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2024. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1455433

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-b817861b221d5e15cf3e903a3d2c15978ee31050c826969eee4b14e4db26ddae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.