Claim · model-written summary
No-till gave a lower maize yield (6.11 t/ha) than ploughing.
- Treatment
- No-tille1
- Outcome
- maize yielde1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 6.11 t/hae1
- Comparator
- ploughinge1
- Setting
- Northern Steppe of Ukrainee0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The optimisation of maize cultivation technologies in the Northern Steppe of Ukraine”
e1“The highest maize yield (6.99 t/ha) was obtained after ploughing, while chisel tillage provided 6.62 t/ha, disc harrowing – 6.27 t/ha, and No-till – 6.11 t/ha”
Title
FACTORS OF AGRICULTURE AND REGULATION OF GROWTH RESPONSE IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS
M. S. Shevchenko; O. O. Mytsyk; S. M. Shevchenko; et al. Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture 2025. doi:10.32782/2310-0478-2025-1-35-41
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Ploughing gave the highest maize yield (6.99 t/ha).
- Intervention effect Chisel tillage gave a lower maize yield (6.62 t/ha) than ploughing.
- Intervention effect Disc harrowing gave a lower maize yield (6.27 t/ha) than ploughing.
- Intervention effect Reducing tillage depth decreased field emergence of maize by 3.3–7.8% compared with ploughing.
- Intervention effect Herbicide application reduced weed density in maize by 58–91%.
- Intervention effect Minimal and zero tillage increased the accumulation of crop residues in the upper soil layer by up to 97%.
- Intervention effect Minimal and zero tillage slowed maize crop emergence, with residues influencing the thermal regime.
- Recommendation Ploughing is recommended as the optimal primary tillage method for maize in the region.
- Intervention effect Minimal and zero tillage reduced seedling emergence and yield of maize.
- Intervention effect Minimal and zero tillage positively affected erosion resistance of the soil under maize.