Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CA c increased chickpea NPK uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
triple zero-tilled CA c plots with residue-retentione0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ConvTill plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK uptake and micronutrient (Fe and Zn) biofortification in chickpea grains were again significantly higher under triple zero-tilled CA c plots with residue-retention; which was followed by triple zero-tilled CA p plots without residue-retention and the ConvTill plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1650

Title

Triple-zero tillage and system intensification lead to enhanced productivity, micronutrient biofortification and moisture-stress tolerance ability in chickpea in a pearlmillet-chickpea cropping system of semi-arid climate

Ram Swaroop Bana; Mukhtar Ahmad Faiz; Seema Sangwan; et al. Scientific Reports 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36044-0

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-bb1a36c223a099edb2b9cc0d292a609e4ec562a8dd57b4bd24f79969d729aef6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.