Claim · model-written summary
CA c raised chickpea grain yield 23.5% under PCFCS over conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- CA ce0
- Outcome
- chickpea grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 23.5e0
- Qualifier
- PCFCSe0
- Comparator
- ConvTille0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant increase in chickpea grain yield under CA c to the tune of 27, 23.5 and 28.5% under PCCS, PCFCS and PCMCS, respectively over ConvTill”
Title
Ram Swaroop Bana; Mukhtar Ahmad Faiz; Seema Sangwan; et al. Scientific Reports 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36044-0
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect CA c raised chickpea grain yield 27% under PCCS over conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect CA c raised chickpea grain yield 28.5% under PCMCS over conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect CA c increased chickpea NPK uptake.
- Intervention effect CA c increased Fe and Zn biofortification in chickpea grain.
- Intervention effect CA c in PCMCS raised chickpea relative leaf water content about 20.8% over ConvTill in PCCS.
- Intervention effect CA management and system intensification enhanced four biochemical enzyme properties in chickpea.
- Intervention effect Triple zero-tilled CA c reduced N2O fluxes in chickpea.
- Intervention effect Triple zero-tilled CA c raised CO2 emissions slightly.
- Intervention effect Triple zero-tilled CA c curtailed net greenhouse-gas emissions.
- Intervention effect Triple zero-tilled PCFCS and PCMCS improved soil microbial populations.
- Intervention effect Triple zero-tilled PCFCS and PCMCS improved soil enzyme activities.
- Recommendation Authors recommend PCMCS with CA c for chickpea productivity, biofortification, and moisture tolerance.
- Recommendation Farmers should balance CA c and CA p adoption where livestock competes for fodder.