Paper · 2023 · Scientific Reports

Triple-zero tillage and system intensification lead to enhanced productivity, micronutrient biofortification and moisture-stress tolerance ability in chickpea in a pearlmillet-chickpea cropping system of semi-arid climate

Ram Swaroop Bana; Mukhtar Ahmad Faiz; Seema Sangwan; et al.

14
claims
17
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Pearlmillet-chickpea cropping system (PCCS) is emerging as an important sequence in semi-arid regions of south-Asia owing to less water-requirement. However, chickpea (dry-season crop) faces comparatively acute soil moisture-deficit over pearlmillet (wet-season crop), limiting overall sustainability of PCCS. Hence, moisture-management (specifically in chickpea) and system intensification is highly essential for sustaining the PCCS in holistic manner. Since, conservation agriculture (CA) has emerged is an important climate-smart strategy to combat moisture-stress alongwith other production-vulnerabilities. Hence, current study comprised of three tillage systems in main-plots viz., Complete-CA with residue retention (CA c ), Partial-CA without residue-retention (CA p ), and Conventional-tillage (ConvTill) under three cropping systems in sub-plots viz., conventionally grown pearlmillet-chickpea cropping system (PCCS) alongwith two intensified systems i.e. pearlmillet-chickpea-fodder pearlmillet cropping system (PCFCS) and pearlmillet-chickpea-mungbean cropping system (PCMCS) in split-plot design. The investigation outcomes mainly focused on chickpea (dry-season crop) revealed that, on an average, there was a significant increase in chickpea grain yield under CA c to the tune of 27, 23.5 and 28.5% under PCCS, PCFCS and PCMCS, respectively over ConvTill. NPK uptake and micronutrient (Fe and Zn) biofortification in chickpea grains were again significantly higher under triple zero-tilled CA c plots with residue-retention; which was followed by triple zero-tilled CA p plots without residue-retention and the ConvTill plots. Likewise, CA c under PCMCS led to an increase in relative leaf water (RLW) content in chickpea by ~ 20.8% over ConvTill under PCCS, hence, ameliorating the moisture-stress effects. Interestingly, CA-management and system-intensification significantly enhanced the plant biochemical properties in chickpea viz ., super-oxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase and glutathione reductase; thus, indicating their prime role in inducing moisture-stress tolerance ability in moisture-starved chickpea. Triple zero-tilled CA c plots also reduced the N 2 O fluxes in chickpea but with slightly higher CO 2 emissions, however, curtailed the net GHG-emissions. Triple zero-tilled cropping systems (PCFCS and PCMCS) both under CA c and Ca p led to a significant improvement in soil microbial population and soil enzymes activities (alkaline phosphatase, fluorescein diacetate, dehydrogenase). Overall, the PCCS system-intensification with mungbean (PCMCS) alongwith triple zero-tillage with residue-retention (CA c ) may amply enhance the productivity, micronutrient biofortification and moisture-stress tolerance ability in chickpea besides propelling the ecological benefits under semi-arid agro-ecologies. However, the farmers should preserve a balance while adopting CA c or CA p where livestock equally competes for quality fodder.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CA c raised chickpea grain yield 27% under PCCS over conventional tillage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
CA ce0
Outcome
chickpea grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27e0
Qualifier
PCCSe0
Comparator
ConvTille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in chickpea grain yield under CA c to the tune of 27, 23.5 and 28.5% under PCCS, PCFCS and PCMCS, respectively over ConvTill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CA c raised chickpea grain yield 23.5% under PCFCS over conventional tillage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
CA ce0
Outcome
chickpea grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23.5e0
Qualifier
PCFCSe0
Comparator
ConvTille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in chickpea grain yield under CA c to the tune of 27, 23.5 and 28.5% under PCCS, PCFCS and PCMCS, respectively over ConvTill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CA c raised chickpea grain yield 28.5% under PCMCS over conventional tillage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
CA ce0
Outcome
chickpea grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28.5%e0
Qualifier
PCMCSe0
Comparator
ConvTille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in chickpea grain yield under CA c to the tune of 27, 23.5 and 28.5% under PCCS, PCFCS and PCMCS, respectively over ConvTill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CA c increased chickpea NPK uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
triple zero-tilled CA c plots with residue-retentione0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ConvTill plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK uptake and micronutrient (Fe and Zn) biofortification in chickpea grains were again significantly higher under triple zero-tilled CA c plots with residue-retention; which was followed by triple zero-tilled CA p plots without residue-retention and the ConvTill plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CA c increased Fe and Zn biofortification in chickpea grain.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
triple zero-tilled CA c plots with residue-retentione0
Outcome
micronutrient (Fe and Zn) biofortification in chickpea grainse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ConvTill plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK uptake and micronutrient (Fe and Zn) biofortification in chickpea grains were again significantly higher under triple zero-tilled CA c plots with residue-retention; which was followed by triple zero-tilled CA p plots without residue-retention and the ConvTill plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA c in PCMCS raised chickpea relative leaf water content about 20.8% over ConvTill in PCCS.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
CA c under PCMCSe0
Outcome
relative leaf water (RLW) contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
~ 20.8%e0
Comparator
ConvTill under PCCSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CA c under PCMCS led to an increase in relative leaf water (RLW) content in chickpea by ~ 20.8% over ConvTill under PCCS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CA management and system intensification enhanced four biochemical enzyme properties in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
CA-management and system-intensificatione0
Outcome
super-oxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase and glutathione reductasee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CA-management and system-intensification significantly enhanced the plant biochemical properties in chickpea viz ., super-oxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase and glutathione reductase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple zero-tilled CA c reduced N2O fluxes in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Triple zero-tilled CA c plotse0
Outcome
N 2 O fluxese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triple zero-tilled CA c plots also reduced the N 2 O fluxes in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple zero-tilled CA c raised CO2 emissions slightly.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Triple zero-tilled CA c plotse0
Outcome
CO 2 emissionse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triple zero-tilled CA c plots also reduced the N 2 O fluxes in chickpea but with slightly higher CO 2 emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple zero-tilled CA c curtailed net greenhouse-gas emissions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Triple zero-tilled CA c plotse0
Outcome
net GHG-emissionse0
Direction
curtailede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triple zero-tilled CA c plots also reduced the N 2 O fluxes in chickpea but with slightly higher CO 2 emissions, however, curtailed the net GHG-emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple zero-tilled PCFCS and PCMCS improved soil microbial populations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
PCFCS and PCMCSe0
Outcome
soil microbial populatione0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triple zero-tilled cropping systems (PCFCS and PCMCS) both under CA c and Ca p led to a significant improvement in soil microbial population and soil enzymes activities (alkaline phosphatase, fluorescein diacetate, dehydrogenase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2310–2539 · show in text ↑
t0

“ability in chickpea in a pearlmillet-chickpea cropping system of semi-arid climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple zero-tilled PCFCS and PCMCS improved soil enzyme activities.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
PCFCS and PCMCSe0
Outcome
soil enzymes activitiese0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triple zero-tilled cropping systems (PCFCS and PCMCS) both under CA c and Ca p led to a significant improvement in soil microbial population and soil enzymes activities (alkaline phosphatase, fluorescein diacetate, dehydrogenase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2310–2539 · show in text ↑
t0

“ability in chickpea in a pearlmillet-chickpea cropping system of semi-arid climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–221 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend PCMCS with CA c for chickpea productivity, biofortification, and moisture tolerance.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
triple zero-tillage with residue-retention (CA c )e0
Outcome
productivity, micronutrient biofortification and moisture-stress tolerance abilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PCMCS) alongwith triple zero-tillage with residue-retention (CA c ) may amply enhance the productivity, micronutrient biofortification and moisture-stress tolerance ability in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2597–2781 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers should balance CA c and CA p adoption where livestock competes for fodder.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
preserve a balance while adopting CA c or CA pe0
Qualifier
livestock equally competes for quality foddere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers should preserve a balance while adopting CA c or CA p where livestock equally competes for quality fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2870–2983 · show in text ↑
t0

“ability in chickpea in a pearlmillet-chickpea cropping system of semi-arid climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–221 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

tillage · environment: emissions · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.