Abstract
The article reflects the influence of herbicides and organomineral fertilizers on the coefficient of water consumption and grain yield of chickpea in the Lower Volga region. Minimum subsurface tillage increased the water consumption coefficient by 17.5%. The application of a soil herbicide reduced the water consumption coefficient by 12.8%, and the application of a herbicide during chickpea vegetation – by 15.4%. Foliar feeding with organomineral fertilizers reduced the studied indicator from 12.4 to 22.9%. It was found out that the most significant effect on chickpea grain yield had foliar organomineral fertilizing during the branching phase with an increase of 13.5–28.8%. The next factor influencing chickpea yield is chemical weed control measures, where the increase was 13.5–17.8%. The basic treatment had a less significant effect – 11.1%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum subsurface tillage increased the chickpea water consumption coefficient by 17.5%.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Minimum subsurface tillagee0
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 17.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Minimum subsurface tillage increased the water consumption coefficient by 17.5%.”
t0“The influence of herbicides and organomineral fertilizers on the water consumption coefficient of chickpea in the Lower Volga region”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil herbicide reduced chickpea water consumption coefficient by 12.8%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- soil herbicidee0
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 12.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of a soil herbicide reduced the water consumption coefficient by 12.8%”
t0“The influence of herbicides and organomineral fertilizers on the water consumption coefficient of chickpea in the Lower Volga region”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide during chickpea vegetation reduced water consumption coefficient by 15.4%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- herbicide during chickpea vegetatione0
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 15.4%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of a soil herbicide reduced the water consumption coefficient by 12.8%, and the application of a herbicide during chickpea vegetation – by 15.4%.”
t0“The influence of herbicides and organomineral fertilizers on the water consumption coefficient of chickpea in the Lower Volga region”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding with organomineral fertilizers reduced the water consumption coefficient by 12.4 to 22.9%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Foliar feeding with organomineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficientt0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 12.4 to 22.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar feeding with organomineral fertilizers reduced the studied indicator from 12.4 to 22.9%.”
t0“The influence of herbicides and organomineral fertilizers on the water consumption coefficient of chickpea in the Lower Volga region”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar organomineral fertilizing during branching increased chickpea grain yield by 13.5–28.8%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar organomineral fertilizing during the branching phasee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 13.5–28.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was found out that the most significant effect on chickpea grain yield had foliar organomineral fertilizing during the branching phase with an increase of 13.5–28.8%.”
t0“The influence of herbicides and organomineral fertilizers on the water consumption coefficient of chickpea in the Lower Volga region”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical weed control increased chickpea yield by 13.5–17.8%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- chemical weed control measurese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 13.5–17.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next factor influencing chickpea yield is chemical weed control measures, where the increase was 13.5–17.8%.”
t0“The influence of herbicides and organomineral fertilizers on the water consumption coefficient of chickpea in the Lower Volga region”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →herbicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
117 papers more in this group
See all 121 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →micronutrient · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.