Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Most BnaHsf genes were upregulated by drought and heat.

A claim from Systematic Analysis of Hsf Family Genes in the Brassica napus Genome Reveals Novel Responses to Heat, Drought and High CO2 Stresses · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most BnaHsf genes were upregulated by drought and heat.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
drought and heat conditionse0
Gene
BnaHsf family genese0
Outcome
BnaHsf family genes are upregulatede0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most BnaHsf family genes are upregulated by both drought and heat conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1073
t0

“Systematic Analysis of Hsf Family Genes in the Brassica napus Genome Reveals Novel Responses to Heat, Drought and High CO2 Stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131

Title

Systematic Analysis of Hsf Family Genes in the Brassica napus Genome Reveals Novel Responses to Heat, Drought and High CO2 Stresses

Xiaoyi Zhu; Chunqian Huang; Liang Zhang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2017. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01174

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-bbbb8bd642ed63d25eacab7db214d95636cf145936c785b022b5078b0cfe6ee6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

heat · molecular: expression · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

drought · molecular: expression · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.