Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Recommended agronomic practices without fertilization significantly increased rice grain yield by about 12% over farmers’ practice.

A claim from Yields and Yield Gaps in Lowland Rice Systems and Options to Improve Smallholder Production · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended agronomic practices without fertilization significantly increased rice grain yield by about 12% over farmers’ practice.

Treatment
RAP without fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
ca. 12%e0
Comparator
FPe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37
e0

“RAP without fertilization and FIP significantly increased grain yield, each by ca. 12%, whereas RAP+NPK application produced ca. 33% extra yield, over FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–642

Title

Yields and Yield Gaps in Lowland Rice Systems and Options to Improve Smallholder Production

Thomas Awio; Kalimuthu Senthilkumar; Christian O. Dimkpa; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12030552

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-bbeef5d44c32acbb31945dbeec432f58be8d3a382183d2c319001866d7139c3e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.