Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low concentration ethephon with copper sulphate was highly effective for apple rootstock defoliation.

A claim from Chemical defoliation of apple rootstocks and the influence of rootstocks type on the defoliation of 'Jonathan' scion · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low concentration ethephon with copper sulphate was highly effective for apple rootstock defoliation.

Treatment
mixture of ethephon with copper sulphatee0
Outcome
defoliationt0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Qualifier
low concentrationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of ethephon with copper sulphate in which both components were used in low concentrations also appeared highly effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–899
t0

“defoliation of apple rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–40

Title

Chemical defoliation of apple rootstocks and the influence of rootstocks type on the defoliation of 'Jonathan' scion

A. Basak; L. S. Jankiewicz Acta Agrobotanica 2013. doi:10.5586/aa.1982.015

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-bcae5ca44548c1e17b9f4528455b4e430afe9df9645cf8850e180573dc33d066 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

copper atom · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.