Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment T5 gave significantly higher fodder yield (7052 kg ha-1).

A claim from Effect of foliar application of major plant nutrients on yield and economics of rabi sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 gave significantly higher fodder yield (7052 kg ha-1).

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
soil application of 40:20:20 NPK kg ha-1 (RDF) + spray of nano urea @ 4 ml liter-1 of water + 2% spray of DAP at panicle initiation stage (T5)e0
Outcome
fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7052 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of 40:20:20 NPK kg ha-1 (RDF) + spray of nano urea @ 4 ml liter-1 of water + 2% spray of DAP at panicle initiation stage (T5) recorded significantly higher grain yield plant-1 (28.94 g), number of grains earhead-1 (1120), grain yield (2486 kg ha-1), fodder yield (7052 kg ha-1), biological yield (9538 kg ha-1), gross monetary returns (114318` ha-1), net monetary returns (78989` ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.24 ` ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1477
t0

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113

Title

Effect of foliar application of major plant nutrients on yield and economics of rabi sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Niranjani V Sawane; Gajanan D Gadade; Pritam O Bhutada; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i11b.1948

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-bd3ca8c8b32cbaf5ea0760ee202a053d8e2cb4ff87bb70ee5c49d628e5e04422 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

281 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.