Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn application strategies did not affect maize grain Zn concentration, which ranged from 19.5 to 43.1 mg kg−1.

A claim from Effect of zinc application strategies on maize grain yield and zinc concentration in mollisols · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application strategies did not affect maize grain Zn concentration, which ranged from 19.5 to 43.1 mg kg−1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn-ASe2
Outcome
Grain Zn concentratione2
Direction
not affectede2
Value
19.5 to 43.1 mg kg−1e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–58
e2

“Grain Zn concentration ranged from 19.5 to 43.1 mg kg−1 and was not affected by Zn-AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1043

Title

Effect of zinc application strategies on maize grain yield and zinc concentration in mollisols

Nicolás Martínez-Cuesta; Walter Carciochi; Hernán Sainz-Rozas; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1844754

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bdf9a995bf6dd6dabe989645a7bc3817a1f5ef56f80dcee30295b23cf6688373 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 199 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

226 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.