Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compared with conventional supply, optimized water and nitrogen application improved dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and the ratio of nitrogen in fruit.

A claim from Effects of Water and Nitrogen Supply on Dry Matter Accumulation,Nutrient Uptake and Distribution in Greenhouse Winter-spring Cucumber · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with conventional supply, optimized water and nitrogen application improved dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and the ratio of nitrogen in fruit.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
optimized water and nitrogen application ratee0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation,nitrogen uptake and the ratio of nitrogen in fruite0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
conventional water and nitrogen supplye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greenhouse Winter-spring Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–133
e0

“Compared with conventional water and nitrogen supply,optimized water and nitrogen application rate improved dry matter accumulation,nitrogen uptake and the ratio of nitrogen in fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1432

Title

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Supply on Dry Matter Accumulation,Nutrient Uptake and Distribution in Greenhouse Winter-spring Cucumber

Huijun Wu Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2012

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-be408bc7d0886859bc8d5cada11cc8fb2a0746caa2a29cc57ac56968994c4b4f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.