Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage with 100% N and Azotobacter lowered NDICP over other treatments.

A claim from Nutritional quality of baby corn fodder as influenced by tillage practices and nitrogen management · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with 100% N and Azotobacter lowered NDICP over other treatments.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
100% N + Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
NDICPe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower NDICP was observed in ZT with 125% N and 100% N + Azotobacter over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1535
t0

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32

Title

Nutritional quality of baby corn fodder as influenced by tillage practices and nitrogen management

MALLIKARJUN MALLIKARJUN; HARDEV RAM; RAKESH KUMAR; et al. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 2019. doi:10.56093/ijans.v89i8.93026

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-beb46ec54c2a804e8d46e2c107c06119ddf9482847c915aee736964fa111006b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.