Paper · 2024 · Plant Science Today

Effects of integrated nutrient management and fertilizers on the yield of baby corn in Punjab's climatic context

Ramandeep Singh; Rubina Gill; Manisha Chaudhary; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The combined impacts of climate change and increased chemical fertilizer use are diminishing soil fertility, thereby reducing agricultural productivity and farmland yield potential. This study investigates the effect of integrated nutrient management on baby corn. Results showed that the highest cob length (14.28 cm) and green fodder yield (45.56 t ha-1) were achieved using elevated levels of nitrogen (160 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (120 kg ha-1), supplemented with zinc (6 kg ha-1) and Azotobacter. Soil nutrient availability was assessed, indicating that treatment with 160 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobacter results in available nitrogen levels of 277.2 kg ha-1 and the highest organic carbon content (0.26%). Available phosphorus content (ranging from 24.1 to 24.3 kg P ha-1) is observed with 120 kg P. Nutritional quality parameters were also influenced by nutrient levels, with the treatment of 160 kg N + 120 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobacter showing the highest total soluble solids (11.2% brix) and protein content (17.9%). The treatment of 140 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zn exhibits the maximum fiber content (26.5%). In summary, the study underscores the positive impact of biofertilizers and zinc on fodder yield and soil properties. Integrating biofertilizers and micronutrients is recommended for sustaining agriculture and maintaining soil health over the long term.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high N and P treatment with Zn and Azotobacter produced the highest cob length, 14.28 cm.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
nitrogen (160 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (120 kg ha-1), supplemented with zinc (6 kg ha-1) and Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
cob lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.28 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest cob length (14.28 cm) and green fodder yield (45.56 t ha-1) were achieved using elevated levels of nitrogen (160 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (120 kg ha-1), supplemented with zinc (6 kg ha-1) and Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the highest green fodder yield, 45.56 t ha-1.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
nitrogen (160 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (120 kg ha-1), supplemented with zinc (6 kg ha-1) and Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
45.56 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest cob length (14.28 cm) and green fodder yield (45.56 t ha-1) were achieved using elevated levels of nitrogen (160 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (120 kg ha-1), supplemented with zinc (6 kg ha-1) and Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 160 N plus 100 P treatment with Zn and Azotobacter yielded available soil N of 277.2 kg ha-1.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
160 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
available nitrogen levelse0
Value
277.2 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with 160 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobacter results in available nitrogen levels of 277.2 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–670 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave the highest soil organic carbon, 0.26%.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
160 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobactere0
Outcome
organic carbon contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with 160 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobacter results in available nitrogen levels of 277.2 kg ha-1 and the highest organic carbon content (0.26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–717 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg P treatment had available phosphorus of 24.1 to 24.3 kg P ha-1.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
120 kg Pe0
Outcome
Available phosphorus contente0
Value
24.1 to 24.3 kg P ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Available phosphorus content (ranging from 24.1 to 24.3 kg P ha-1) is observed with 120 kg P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 160 N plus 120 P treatment with Zn and Azotobacter gave the highest total soluble solids, 11.2% brix.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
160 kg N + 120 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobactere0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.2% brixe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“160 kg N + 120 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobacter showing the highest total soluble solids (11.2% brix) and protein content (17.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave the highest protein content, 17.9%.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
160 kg N + 120 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobactere0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“160 kg N + 120 kg P + 6 kg Zn + Azotobacter showing the highest total soluble solids (11.2% brix) and protein content (17.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 140 N plus 100 P treatment with Zn had maximum fiber content, 26.5%.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
140 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zne0
Outcome
fiber contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
26.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“140 kg N + 100 kg P + 6 kg Zn exhibits the maximum fiber content (26.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1123 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend integrating biofertilizers and micronutrients for long-term agriculture and soil health.

Taxon
baby corne1
Outcome
Integrating biofertilizers and micronutrientse0

Verbatim

e0

“Integrating biofertilizers and micronutrients is recommended for sustaining agriculture and maintaining soil health over the long term.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1378 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–263 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 37 positive, 5 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

zinc atom · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.