Paper · 2021 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Zinc Phasing and Fertilization Effects on Soil Properties and Some Agromorphological Parameters in Maize–Wheat Cropping System

Sonal Kumar; Gayatri Verma; SS Dhaliwal

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The poor availability of zinc (Zn) in soil is due to the restricted replenishment of micronutrients in intensive agricultural systems. Zinc application is the most practical approach for treating zinc deficiency. The study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of Zn applications at different levels (2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 kg ha−1) and phasing (once in 6 years, alternate year, and every year) and one control on soil properties and agromorphological parameters. The experiment was initiated in the year 2012 (rabi season) at the research farm of Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, in a randomized block design with 13 treatments replicated three times. Results after 6 years of experimentation revealed that available nitrogen, potassium, DTPA-extractable Zn, and manganese (Mn) in soil increased with increasing Zn levels when applied once, alternate year, and every year. However, DTPA iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) showed no definite trend. Zinc fertilization at different phasing showed nonsignificant effect on pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and organic carbon (OC). The plant height, number of tillers per meter, and number of leaves per plant were maximum with treatment 10 kg Zn ha−1 when applied every year and were significantly superior over no zinc. Although treatment zinc application of 10 kg ha−1 every year was statistically at par with treatments zinc application of 7.5 kg ha−1 every year and 10 kg ha−1 of alternate year. Hence, results indicated that Zn application of 10 kg ha−1 in alternate year significantly improved soil properties and agromorphological parameters under maize–wheat cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil nitrogen, potassium, zinc and manganese increased with zinc level.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing Zn levelse0
Outcome
available nitrogen, potassium, DTPA-extractable Zn, and manganese (Mn) in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available nitrogen, potassium, DTPA-extractable Zn, and manganese (Mn) in soil increased with increasing Zn levels when applied once, alternate year, and every year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil iron and copper showed no definite trend with zinc application.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
DTPA iron (Fe) and copper (Cu)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DTPA iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) showed no definite trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc phasing had no significant effect on soil pH, conductivity, or organic carbon.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
Zinc fertilization at different phasinge0
Outcome
pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and organic carbon (OC)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc fertilization at different phasing showed nonsignificant effect on pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and organic carbon (OC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual 10 kg zinc yielded maximum plant height, tillers and leaf number, exceeding no zinc.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
10 kg Zn ha−1 when applied every yeare0
Outcome
plant height, number of tillers per meter, and number of leaves per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
no zince0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, number of tillers per meter, and number of leaves per plant were maximum with treatment 10 kg Zn ha−1 when applied every year and were significantly superior over no zinc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual 10 kg zinc was statistically at par with annual 7.5 kg and alternate-year 10 kg zinc.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
zinc application of 10 kg ha−1 every yeare0
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Comparator
zinc application of 7.5 kg ha−1 every year and 10 kg ha−1 of alternate yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application of 10 kg ha−1 every year was statistically at par with treatments zinc application of 7.5 kg ha−1 every year and 10 kg ha−1 of alternate year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate-year 10 kg zinc improved soil properties and agromorphological traits.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn application of 10 kg ha−1 in alternate yeare0
Outcome
soil properties and agromorphological parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn application of 10 kg ha−1 in alternate year significantly improved soil properties and agromorphological parameters under maize–wheat cropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 303 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.